The other thing with the RX 5600 XT is the drivers are still a little buggy. The GTX 1650 Super was launched recently as AMD was claiming "the RX 5500 beats the GTX 1650." 4GB variant is notably slower in certain titles. Ghost Recon: Breakpoint was also very demanding, and our Radeon was unable to crest 50 fps at max settings. It enables you to keep your drivers up to date, offers performance-optimized game setting configurations, and allows you to launch your games from the GeForce Experience dashboard. As for the differences, at 1080p the 1660 Ti was 26% ahead in average FPS and 27% at 1440p. Hardware. The backside of the card we do find a full-length backplate. UserBenchmark USA-User . However, for just a few dollars more you can get better gaming performance from a GeForce GTX 1660. Battlefield 5 was tested in campaign mode rather than multiplayer, as it’s easier to consistently reproduce the test run. Galaxy A50 Galaxy A50s BUY NOW BUY NOW PROS PROS Best display for the price.Design reminiscent of flagships.Low price.Solid performance. Release date October 2019. AMD also offers a feature called Game Boost, which monitors your framerate and dynamically adjusts the resolution of your games when it won’t impact the visual experience to maximize performance. Nvidia’s offering outperforms the competition handily in gaming tests, which if we’re honest is kind of the point of a graphics card—especially in the $200 range. And Nvidia had not yet launched the RT and Tensor core-free 16-series Turing GPUs for the mid-range market. Last year at this time, gamers were eagerly awaiting the reveal of AMD’s Navi architecture and the new line of GPUs that would reinvigorate the company’s Radeon Graphics brand. Based on 144,624 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 5500-XT and the Nvidia GTX 1660, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. Release date January 2020. 66. Dell Inspiron 15 (7590) vs XPS 15 (7590): Which One Will Be Better? Nvidia GTX 1660 vs AMD RX 580: Which to Buy? RX 5500 XT 8GB karşı GTX 1660 performans karşılaştırması. AMD RX 590 vs Nvidia GTX 1060: Which One is Better? Today, we’ve got myriad options from team red, including the recently launched Radeon RX 5500 XT, which introduces Navi to the high-volume segment of the market, in the $200 price range. Ansel also offers free-camera capture, which allows you to snap angles that aren’t possible in-game, and the ability to capture 360-degree images. The Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti and RX 5500 XT are both decent gaming graphics cards, but which should you pick? Reward calculation Filter. Specs. By the numbers, AMD’s RX 5500 XT appears to be the stronger of the two GPUs. GTX 1650 Vs 1660 Ti: Which is Better for Laptop? This time around, the tables have turned and Nvidia has captured the mid-tier crown back from AMD. However, AMD’s option still delivers acceptable performance and costs a few dollars less, which somewhat evens that playing field. The GTX 1660 often held a 5% or better lead over the RX 5500 XT in our max settings tests. Home > Graphics card comparison > AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC Ultra Gaming. The power requirements for either of these cards is low enough to be negligible. There was a problem. We tested 11 relatively demanding games on both GPUs with maximum and medium settings enabled. RX 5600 XT vs GTX 1660 Super. 70 points. Now the question becomes, which card should you choose if you’re in the market for a new GPU for roughly $200. Intro The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti features a GPU clock speed of 1500 MHz, and the 6144 MB of GDDR6 memory is set to run at 1500 MHz through a 192-bit bus. New York, AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs RX 580: Which Should You Get? When it comes to power consumption then GTX 1650 SUPER is clearly the winner, having maximum power consumption figure of only 100W. However, the low heat output from the Radeon RX 5500 XT, likely aided by its smaller 7nm process, gives AMD a leg up in this category. We have the dual X cooling which obviously involves two fans. At 1080p the 5500 XT was 6% ahead of the 1660 Ti, and then 8% ahead at 1440p. The 1660 Ti card was achieving 16% higher average FPS at 1080p, lowering to almost 8% at 1440p. The GTX 1660 Super was 11% faster, though the 5500 XT was 8% faster than the GTX 1650 Super. In terms of the size, this card is neither large nor small and so it should fit into a good range of different size cases. The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 sample that we tested in March 2019 needed an average of 126 watts, and peaked at 134 watts, and the Zotac model that we used in the Radeon RX 5500 XT review pulled between 110 and 120 watts in our Metro: Exodus power test. The GTX 1660 Super is much stronger than the older GTX 1660. The Witcher 3 was tested with Hairworks disabled, and like most other games was playable at both 1080p and 1440p even with ultra settings in use. Each card supports automated game optimization, game streaming, and driver update software. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. You will receive a verification email shortly. GeForce Battles Radeon in the realm of $200 gaming cards. Units. It’s manufactured on a smaller, more efficient process, offers a higher base and boost clock speed, and has a higher theoretical performance limit. Based on 197,710 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 5500-XT and the Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. CPU GPU SSD ... 5500 5500-XT 5600-XT 5700-XT 5700. Visit our corporate site. The system that I’m testing in has an Intel i9-9900K. AMD’s Radeon RX 5500 XT features a TDP rating of 130w, whereas Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660 includes a TDP rating of 120w. The RX5500 is a pitiful upgrade over what was already available for sub-$200 three years ago. That GPU’s successor, the GTX 1660 Super, is somewhat more expensive ($230+), but the original model is still readily available and often sells for $210 or less. Much more efficient than Polaris. This is likely the same PCB used by the dual fan models. AMD’s Radeon RX 5500 XT features a TDP rating of 130w, whereas Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660 includes a TDP rating of 120w. GeForce Experience also includes Nvidia’s advanced screenshot capture technology, called Nvidia Ansel, which allows you to capture extremely high-resolution (up to 33x 1080p) images of supported games. So the results at 1440p would be different. It is cheaper than RX 5600 XT, and also has GDDR5 memory of 6 GB. It also features 1536 SPUs, 96 TAUs, and 48 Raster Operation Units. I would have given features to AMD easily for the goodies they add to their driver suite. At 1080p we’re looking at a 4% improvement to average frame rate, increasing to 18% higher once we turn the resolution up to 1440p. Multi pools. Multi pools. It can still reach 70 FPS at 1440p in terms of efficiency, and is very playable at 1440p for most games. Similarly-priced Radeon RX Vega 56 is faster. Radeon RX 5500 XT GeForce GTX 1660; GPU Name: Navi 14 (Navi 14 XTX (215-0932396)) vs: TU116 Fab Process: 7 nm: vs: 12 nm: Die Size: 158 mm² Recently, however, AMD has started phasing out the later in … Samsung Galaxy A50s Vs A50: Is it Worth Upgrading? The system also has Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 memory and is running Windows 10 with all updates to date applied. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). The Radeon RX 5500 XT also supports a technology called Radeon Anti-Lag, which aims to reduce input lag by managing the queue of work sent to the CPU and ensuring that the CPU can’t get ahead of the GPU. The last time we did a showdown of the mid-range GPUs, we put the Radeon RX 590 toe to toe with the GeForce GTX 1060 and AMD’s card was the definitive winner. Following our review, we already know it’s not as powerful as Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660, but can it offer enough value to make up for what it lacks in performance? Following three passes of our Metro: Exodus test, the data showed that the GPU never exceeded 63C. I'd like to see those cards tested battling while overclocked. Our tests with Gigabyte’s GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G showed that it peaked at a 68C. TOTAL WAR: WARHAMMER was tested with the built in benchmark and ultra settings in use, and is another resource heavy game. Coming in with a $229 price. The cooler on the GTX 1660 Ti has three heat pipes. According to Igor's calculations, the GTX 1660 SUPER will be 2.8% faster than the AMD RX 500 XT and 4.3% slower than the GTX 1660 Ti. AMD is no stranger to this price point. I have tested 8 games at 1080p. Nvidia does provide a larger 192-bit memory bus versus AMD’s 128-bit memory bus configuration, but the faster memory more than makes up for the difference in bus size. Legal Disclaimer And Affiliate Disclaimer. DEUS EX MANKIND DIVIDED was tested with the built in benchmark at ultra settings. Thanks to TSMC’s 7nm finFET process, AMD’s GPU fits on a 158 mm² die. This game saw a pretty big improvement with the 1660 Ti, with a 25.5% higher average frame rate at 1080p and 1440p. USD/kWh. Electricity costs. Winner: Tie. Based on 125,841 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 5500 and the Nvidia GTX 1660, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 651 GPUs. Also, Radeon Image Sharpening combines contrast-adaptive sharpening with GPU upscaling to produce crisper in-game visuals. If you compare these cards at the same price, the GeForce GTX 1660 is the clear winner. In practice, the Radeon GPUs actually draw quite a bit less than 130 watts, except under extreme loads. As for the differences, the 1660 Ti was scoring 14% higher average frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. AMD’s answer was the Radeon RX 5500 XT. This seems to be more of a graphically intensive test, and the 1660 Ti was coming out ahead in both resolutions. We tested two examples of the RX 5500 XT, a 4GB Sapphire and an 8GB Gigabyte card, and we found that, in-game, the AMD card will average close to 100w. What a difference a year can make. Winner: Nvidia. The card that consumes the most power is the older RX 580 that can draw up to 185W of power at full load. Both AMD and Nvidia recommend at least a 450-watt power supply for their respective cards. Watch Dogs 2 is a resource intensive game and was tested with ultra settings. And GTX 1660 Ti is recommended choice to buy because it was performing better than 5500 XT with the almost same price. But pricing is close and can always change. HITMAN 2 was tested using the built in benchmark with ultra settings, and we were seeing almost a 37% improvement with the 1660 Ti at both 1080p and 1440p. With alerts. The 5500 XT is going to be available in two variants, 4GB and 8GB. The Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti and RX 5500 XT are both decent gaming graphics cards, but which should you pick? For several generations, the Radeon team has focused its attention on mainstream cards like the RX 480, 580, and 590 (all based on the same Polaris architecture). ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 Vs Apple MacBook Pro: Which is Better? Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super XFX Radeon RX 5500 XT Thicc II Pro The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). The GeForce GTX 1660 takes full advantage of Nvidia’s NVENC hardware encoder technology, which lowers the CPU overhead associated with software encoding. I am using Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC in this review. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. We compared the features and benefits of the Radeon RX 5500 XT and the GeForce GTX 1660 in four categories -- featured technology, game performance, power consumption & heat output and Value -- to help you decide which of these two cards is right for you. Our Gigabyte RX 5500 XT OC 8G proved to be one of the coolest-running GPUs that we’ve seen in this segment. AMD’s NAVI 14 XTX features 6.4 billion transistors, which is 200 million fewer than the Turing TU116, but AMD crammed its chip into a much smaller package. It’s an exciting time to be in the market for a new GPU, with several new products on the market in the last 12 months. The GeForce GTX 1660 falls right in the middle, with 6GB of graphics memory. Initially, the 8GB variant was priced the same as the GeForce GTX 1660, making it a hard pass, while the 4GB model costed the same as the GTX 1650 Super. Grafik kartı oyun performansını 57 oyunlarda ve 1080p, 1440p ve 4K'deki Ultra, High, Medium ve Low kalite ayarlarında karşılaştırın. The World’s Best And Worst is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and any other website that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program. The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%.It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660.The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 edition also lets launch games directly from the Radeon Software dashboard. Personally I would hesitate to try multiplayer gaming on either of these cards...they seem more low end than mainstream. Rumor has it that the Radeon RX 5500 will use AMD's Navi 14 silicon. It’s also worth noting that the fans on the GeForce were spinning at 2000 rpm, and the Radeon card spun at a leisurely 1800 rpm. Winner: Nvidia. RX 5500 XT vs GTX 1660 Super. FAR CRY PRIMAL was tested using the built in benchmark with ultra settings, and once again the 1660 Ti was coming out ahead. Currency. In practice, the Radeon GPUs actually draw quite a … Shadow of the Tomb Raider was also tested using the built in benchmark with high settings. x. None of the GPUs of this calibre draw anywhere near enough power to make a significant difference in your system’s configuration. BTR received a Sapphire Pulse RX 5500 XT OC 4GB ($169) review sample from AMD on Monday, and we benchmarked it using 46 games versus the RX 570 4GB, the RX 590 8GB and versus the GTX 1660 6GB (non-Super). It’s far and away a better card than you would have bought for the same price a year ago. I’m using the best CPU that I can for gaming in order to reduce it being a limiting factor in the benchmarks. Reward calculation Filter. Dell Inspiron 15 7591 vs G5 15 5590: Which One is For You? Nvidia’s configuration appears much more capable of handling games with maximum graphics settings enabled than AMD’s. You likely won’t be concerned with the power requirements for these cards, but higher power draw does equate to higher heat output, which is likely of higher concern to you. You tested the old 1660, and the 8GB RX 5500? The I/O panel, there’s 3 display ports along with a single HDMI port and this is a pretty standard configuration for these cards. Although it operates at a higher frequency and produces higher peak floating-point performance (5.2 TFLOPS vs the GTX 1660’s 5 TFLOPS). While the 1650 Super is the key competitor AMD is highlighting, the pricing of the RX 5500 XT in its 8GB iteration actually moves it closer to the more expensive GTX 1660. Units. GTA 5 was tested using the replay feature with the exact same replay at ultra settings. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was tested with the built in benchmark using high settings, and the 1660 Ti was 14% ahead in average FPS at 1080p and 3% faster at 1440p. However, Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660, which hit store shelves in March of 2019, is a strong contender for your gaming money. This generally results in … x. Raspberry Pi Welcomes IQaudio To the Fold, Newegg's Revised Return Policy Angers Customers, Cyberpunk 2077 Bug Bulldozes AMD Ryzen: Here's a Fix, Tested, Cyber Prusa: The Official Cyberpunk 3D Printer Mod by Prusa, MSI's GF65 Laptop Drops to Just $899 at Newegg. Özellikleri, fiyatı, gücü, sıcaklığı ve CPU darboğazlarını karşılaştırın. Comparing the value of the Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB to the GeForce GTX 1660 is a somewhat challenging task. In my opinion this one doesn’t need a high frame rate to play, I can get by with a solid 30 FPS, so both cards were giving me very a playable experience at 1440p. However, the GTX 1660 fell just a sliver short with an average framerate of 58.7 fps on max settings. Winner: AMD. Samsung Galaxy S20+ Vs iPhone 11 Pro Max: Which is Better Option? The RX 5700 XT is designed for 1440p and so this new RX 5500 XT is designed to tackle 1080p. But for this comparison, we’re focusing on the 8GB version. Radeon RX 5500 GeForce GTX 1660; GPU Name: Navi 14 (Navi 14 XT) vs: TU116 Fab Process: 7 nm: vs: 12 nm: Die Size: 158 mm²: vs: 284 mm²: Transistors: 6,400 million In terms of average FPS the 1660 Ti was 21% ahead of the 5500 XT at 1080p, and 7% ahead at 1440p. It just trap hot air on the backside of the PCB. Like most areas of PC tech, price cuts and new products are always coming along to change the battle for your hard-earned component dollars. And they both support performance optimization features that maximize your gameplay experience. The higher capacity of faster GDDR6 memory also gives it a significant advantage. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5500 XT. The Radeon RX 5500 XT supports both FreeSync and FreeSync 2, whereas the GeForce 1660 is compatible with Nvidia’s more-expensive G-Sync adaptive display technology. Despite having the superior on-paper specifications and equivalent software features, in a competition of might, the GTX 1660 outperformed the RX 5500 XT in almost every test we threw at these two cards. AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT. Dell Inspiron 15 7591 vs Inspiron 15 7590: Which One is Better to Buy? If you compare the price, there is not too much difference. I was not able to do it at 1440p. Where the Radeon maybe 5% to 10% cheaper, it’s also 5% to 10% slower in many cases. It is made from plastic, so it won’t aid in cooling. 66 $ 399. Nvidia’s software supports media capture and game streaming features that integrate with popular streaming platforms. More demanding titles such as Borderlands 3 and Metro: Exodus, we had to drop the settings to medium to achieve the coveted bare minimum of 60 fps. As a result, the TU116-300-A1 is nearly twice the size of NAVI 14 XTX at 284 mm². I am using SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 8GB in this review. The price-performance of the GTX 1650 Super disturbs the GTX 1660, and so NVIDIA launched the GTX 1650 Super, possibly to preempt the "RX 5500 XT," which it thought … GEARS OF WAR 4 was tested with the Ulletical FPS benchmark, and both cards were delivering very high frame rates. At 1440p we see similar margins, the 5500 XT is still on par with the GTX 1660 … The GTX 1660, the RX 5500 XT and the RX 590 are in approximately the same class when it comes to VR performance although the GeForce card wins seven out of ten games. In The Division 2, Gears of War 5, Strange Brigade, Far Cry 5, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy XIV, Forza Horizon 4 and Battlefield V both cards managed to drive 60 fps average gameplay with the graphics settings maxed right out. In fact, in terms of dimensions they are identical though under the skin they are also quite different. IMHO the 5500 XT is a bit overpriced, but they seem to have decent headroom. RX 5600 XT vs RTX 2060 vs GTX 1660 Ti vs RX 5700. Despite this the 5500 XT was almost averaging 50 FPS in this test at 1440p. Nvidia also supports a select few FreeSync displays. USD/kWh. AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs RX 580: The graphics I used – Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB and Gigabyte Radeon RX 580 Gaming 8GB. Turing GPUs are also manufactured on TSMC’s finFET process, but Nvidia is working with a larger 12nm process. Additionally some of the weight cutting can also be attributed to these smaller PCB which doesn’t stretch the entire length of the cooler instead while the card measures 280 millimeters from end to end, the PCB measures just 225 millimeters. In this article, we’ll test out and compare 12 different games at 1080p and 1440p resolutions to help you see the performance difference between them, and find out which is better value for the price. The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. Competent 60 fps 1080p performance. Interestingly, the Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 peaked around 100w in our Furmark stress test, whereas the Gigabyte sample drew around 130w for this test. And as for performance, both AMD and Nvidia offer dynamic clock speed boosting technologies that automatically overclock your GPU to maximize the capabilities of your hardware configuration. Now let’s take a look at the benchmark results. 65 points. It even offers integrated media capture and game streaming features, including screenshots, video, and instant gif capture as well as compatibility with many popular streaming services such as Twitch, YouTube, Mixer, Facebook and more. AMD recently launched the Radeon RX 5500 XT, which aims to capture the attention of mainstream gamers with a mid-range budget to spend on a GPU. Samsung Note 10 Lite Vs S10 Lite: Which is Better? However, RX 5500 XT and GTX 1660 are not far behind and have power consumption figures of 130W and 120W respectively. Both AMD and Nvidia offer support for adaptive display technology. AMD offers a variety of software features for the Radeon RX 5500 XT. (Detailed Comparison). In this article, we’ll test out and compare 12 different games at 1080p and 1440p resolutions to help you see the performance difference between them, and find out which is better value for the price. GPU Architecture. So if you’re reading this in the weeks and months after first publication (in mid-January 2020), make sure to check your favorite online store to see if the value balance has shifted -- or if something better has come along. Still for those of you who prefer a backplate look, it will satisfy you and it does at least protect the backside of the card. The system that I’m testing in has an Intel Core i7-8700K. Based on 183,907 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 5500-XT and the Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. Nvidia’s GeForce Experience software is a reasonable equivalent to AMD’s Radeon Software Adrenalin. This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card. With alerts. NVENC allows the CPU to send a single set of instructions to the GPU, which the GPU uses to output to your display and broadcast without impeding performance. The company’s Radeon Software allows you to monitor your GPU’s temperature, fan speed and voltage, adjust the graphics settings for your games, access performance reports and game states, and update your GPU drivers. AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Nvidia GTX 1650 Super: Which to Buy? The Sapphire Pulse RX 5500 XT OC 4GB Benchmarked with 46 games vs. the Red Devils RX 570 4GB & RX 590 8GB and vs. the EVGA GTX 1660 XC 6GB. We can’t call the Radeon RX 5500 XT a bad deal. Compare hashrate, power consumption, and profitability of different hardware. If there was true competition between AMD and Nvidia GPUs, the 4GB RX5500 would be a $120 GPU. The two cards nobody should buy? The Radeon RX 5500 XT is available in 4GB and 8GB configurations. On the budget end of the GPU market, power consumption shouldn’t really be much of concern. Both cards produce acceptable performance for 1080p gaming, but the GeForce outshined the Radeon by a small margin in all but two of our tests (at medium settings), but the two that AMD won were by less than a 1% margin. Ansel even supports RAW EXR output, which allows you to make changes to the image in post-processing, such as create HDR-enhanced images. Both the Gigabyte and Sapphire Radeon cards topped 120w in this test, with the Sapphire model touching 136w at its peak. Here is a short and precise comparison between these cards based on their specifications, performance, features, power consumption, and pricing. If you’re not a fan of the RGB lighting then you’ll be pleased to know that we have none of that present. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC Ultra Gaming $ 339. Theoretically, the NAVI 14 XTX has 224 GB/s of memory bandwidth to work with, compared to the 192 GB/s that TU116 offers. Please refresh the page and try again. AMD’s NAVI 14 XTX GPU features the same number of cores (1408) as the version of Nvidia’s Turing TU116-300-A1 chip found in the GTX 1660. Currency. I found both cards to deliver a fairly playable experience with ultra settings, even with 1440p, however the 1660 Ti was getting 15% higher average FPS here, and 9% higher at 1080p. DESTINY 2 was tested with ultra settings. Strangely, the RX 5500 XT is a stronger competitor with medium settings, but why would you settle for medium if you don’t need to?